An American academic attempting to attend a PhD defense treated as a refugee at Schiphol, the Amsterdam airport

border controlAmericans are getting all too accustomed to hearing stories of US-based researchers being denied reentry into the United States after a visit to their native homelands. We also hear of conference speakers being denied entry into the United States at airports. We must not let this become the new normal.

Unfortunately, the US is not alone. A Dutch academic colleague recently reported his experience attempting to come to the rescue of an American researcher arriving to attend a PhD ceremony who was denied entry at Schiphol.


Dr. Adriaan Visser

I give his account below as a guest blog. I asked him for clarification on one point. Dr. Visser told me that so far American colleague had to pay all fees out of her own pocket.

Adriaan Visser

A scientist treated as a refugee at the Dutch border

An US researcher from the Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore) was refused entry into the Netherlands, when arriving at Schiphol airport to attend three PhD defenses at the Free University (Amsterdam) about health care in Ethiopia.

She had supervised these PhD candidates for years. She was required to be at the ceremony as co-supervisor. The main reason for refusing her entry was that the total of her earlier stays of in NL exceeded 90 days by 5 days. Neither she nor I knew about that limitation. It had never been explained by border control.

A little drama unfolded, well known from the treatment of refugees at the Dutch border. After five hours waiting to get a 12 page pre-coded document, there was some unsympathetic communication with the border police. Not understanding the reason of her stay, they mentioning her “so-called type of professor”. The Dutch legal right to consult a superior and to contact a lawyer were not granted. The police forced me to leave the boarder, telling me if I didn’t, force would be used. An hour later, my American colleague was sent back to Washington D.C., escorted by a border police to the waiting plane. Her passport was given to the flight attendant.

Cost for the Dutch government: 2,300 euros.

After a lot of negotiation in the USA with a Dutch lawyer and support by the Free University, she got the permission to return to the Netherlands for four days to attend the PhD defenses as co-supervisor.

Cost: Several thousand dollars for the tickets and lawyer’s fee.

My belief in a human constitutional approach at the border fell below Dutch level.

Adriaan Visser, PhD, researcher/psychologist, Director of, Rotterdam, NL

brexitJCC: Post-Brexit British academics, this could happen to you.


Develop a life-threatening illness before tenure, lose your faculty position and your health-insurance

SUNY Buffalo

Another revealing story of just how  vulnerable Americans are with respect to health insurance and security of employment when they become ill.

The Dutch do it differently

I just came back from a series of lectures to occupational and insurance physicians  in the Netherlands

I was fascinating to learn from my casual conversations with the physicians about the role they played in an almost unimaginably different social system than what we have in the United States.

For a start, we  really don’t have widespread equivalent professional roles in the United States.

Suppose you take a job in the Netherlands and become ill. From the first day, your employer assumes responsibility not only for your health-insurance, but for returning you to whatever level of work you can do as soon as possible.

The employer is also responsible to pay you  while you are out sick for a considerable period of time. Unlike the United States, you don’t have to accumulate paid sick days ata rate of a day or two per month of employment. In the United States, also in contrast to the Netherlands, you may find that taking un paid sick days jeopardizes your job. Don’t even think about taking unpaid time off  for care of a sick relative.

If this is an inaccurate contrast, I welcome any of the occupational insurance physicians with whom I interacted to correct it, or anyone else. But the story below conveys a very different situation the United States for a faculty member on a tenure-track at SUNY Buffalo.

From Inside Higher Education. I encourage you to get a free subscription to their daily newsletter.

A Failed Race Against the Clock

A professor loses her job at SUNY Buffalo, and her advocates say she was denied not only a fair shot at keeping her position, but the ability to stay on health insurance while facing a life-threatening illness.

The basic story

What was a simple nonrenewal of a contract in 2016 has turned into a winding dispute, leaving the professor in question with a life-threatening illness and now — after failed back-channel negotiations between faculty members and administrators — no health-insurance support from SUNY Buffalo. The consequences are likely to go beyond the professor, as well, as faculty and union leaders lead a charge to prevent a similar situation from happening again.


Illness and Negotiations

During the time that the ad hoc grievance committee was investigating the professor’s dismissal, the professor developed a life-threatening illness, Glick said. And come Aug. 15, she would be removed from SUNY Buffalo’s health insurance.

Glick’s solution was to ask the provost to reappoint her temporarily and have faculty members donate their sick pay so she could continue to receive a paycheck and benefits for six months, with the thinking that she would then transition to state disability services.

The university, however, found that would constitute an illegal use of public funds. The union countered with a legal opinion that the arrangement could have been legal.

The back-and-forth, however, never amounted to any sort of agreement. The professor was let go in August as scheduled and lost her health insurance

I would be curious about reactions from academics in the Netherlands and other countries, as well as from my fellow Americans.

Do you like these brief commentaries with links to the social media where you can get more details?

I’m considering offering a service at after the first of the year that may interest  you or someone you know. I will filter out the bad, boring and misleading from social media and offer comments on great content I have carefully selected. These e-zines will be particularly suitable for people who either don’t have the time to search for themselves or who still consider involvement in social media a waste of time.

Stay tuned. Meanwhile, you might want to check other interesting developments at